Sunday, December 28, 2025

World-System (1700-Present) Political Change and The French Republics

 


Political Change in France since the late 1700s has been solidified by the creation of new Republics (I-V) triggered by specific crises. The graphic above plots the overall French growth component, FR1, with the Five Republics and their durations. A Sixth French Republic is being proposed as a successor to the current Fifth Republic to correct perceived systemic problems (see Notes below).


Formation of each prior Republics had been triggered by a specific crisis (see ChatGPT table above). It would be reasonable to assume that any Sixth Republic would also need to be triggered by a crisis.


Notes

FR (0-2000) Measurement Matrix

The FR1 index (0-2000) is a relatively equal weighting of seven indicator variables based on the Kaya Identity. The FR2 and FR3 index Capture Historical Controllers for the French Economy. FR2 = (Q-X) - (N-U+HOURS+L), a Malthusian Export Employment Controller and FR3 = (Q+U-HOURS-X), an Urban Production Employment Controller. 

For descriptions about how the state variables and models are constricted, see the Boiler Plate.


ChatGPT Chronology

Here is the Chronology produced by ChatGPT with notation.



















Monday, December 1, 2025

How is Debt Controlled in Great Britain?





 In a prior post (Is Britain Heading for Another Debt crisis?), I found that the overall Debt controller (DEBT1 = DEBT-GDP) is stable and will return to balance after a Debt Crisis (Debt Shock). A recent article in the Observer (here) describes the process by which the UK Current Budget was formulated. Aside from all the chaos, it seems that there were three options facing the government: (1) Stimulated Growth to reduce debt (shock DEBT1=(DEBT-GDP), (2) Decrease Government Expenditure to reduce debt (DEBT2=(GDP-G) and (3) Increase Taxes (DEBT3=Q+G-TAX). In this post, I explore options #2 and #3.

Either decreasing Government Expenditure or Increasing Taxes would reduce DEBT but not by very much.

In terms of mu UK_DEBT model, options #2 and #3 involve negative shocks to the two DEBT components (DEBT2 and DEBT3) on the DEBT1 controller. The results are presented in the graphic at the beginning of this post. Negative shocks would decrease DEBT1 in less than a 0.50 standard deviation and would have about three years to reach full effect. 

The Business-as-Usual (BAU) Model is not the best model, but it seems to describe how the government is reacting to the budgetary process. The best model for explaining DEBT1 is the World Input Model see path AIC statistics below) but the EU Input model (returning to the EU) also was a good model and was briefly discussed (and rejected) during the Budget formulation process.

One way to explain all the handwringing over the UK Budget is that it is fallout from Brexit(the UK Leaving the EU). The EU has rules about Debt that are always in the background on budget discussions. The UK is now going it alone and has only itself to blame for budget chaos.

Notes

Google AI



More Background


Handwringing:


Debt Crisis Indicators



Debt Crisis Measurement Model


DEBT1 = DEBT-GDP, DEBT2 = GDP-G, and DEBT3 = Q+G-TAX


EU


WL20







Debt Crisis Models











AIC Statistics Debt Crisis